DevSecOps Pipelines
Security as a delivery capability,
not a gate before production.
Overview
Security controls that live where the code does. We build CI/CD pipelines that shift security left without slowing teams down — policy-as-code, signed artefacts, SBOMs generated and verified on every build.
What we build
- Policy-as-code gates (OPA / Kyverno) across build and runtime
- Supply-chain hardening with SLSA-aligned provenance and Sigstore signing
- SBOM generation, dependency scanning, and CVE triage workflows
- Secret scanning and rotation automation
- Compliance evidence collection (ISO 27001, SOC 2, BIO) — generated, not manual
- Runtime threat detection (Falco) wired into incident response
When you need this
DevSecOps only works when security is a delivery capability instead of a pre-production hurdle. These are the usual signals that the current setup isn’t scaling.
- Upcoming audit (ISO 27001, SOC 2, BIO, NIS2) and the evidence isn’t ready
- Security findings land after deploy and go back through a release process instead of being caught earlier
- Customers or regulators asking for SBOMs, signed artefacts, or provenance attestations
- Recent supply-chain incident (xz, Log4Shell, similar) left stakeholders nervous and looking for evidence of controls
- Security team and delivery team are adversaries instead of partners, with bottlenecks at the interface
- Manual evidence collection for audits consumes weeks of engineering time each cycle
- Vulnerability management is a perpetual backlog no-one owns
Common challenges we solve
- Scan output producing noise without context, ownership, or prioritisation — so teams ignore it
- Tool sprawl: SAST, SCA, secrets scanning, container scanning, DAST all running separately with overlapping findings
- False-positive fatigue training teams to dismiss security signals entirely
- Policy enforcement via tickets and review boards instead of automated pipeline gates
- Audit prep becoming a quarterly crisis instead of continuous, automated evidence generation
- Signed artefacts and verified provenance treated as nice-to-have instead of non-negotiable
- Secret rotation done manually, inconsistently, and often reactively after exposure
Outcomes we deliver
- Security signals routed directly to code owners, with context and clear remediation paths
- Every build produces a signed artefact with attached SBOM and verifiable provenance chain
- Compliance evidence generated and archived automatically on every pipeline run — audit-ready by default
- CVE-to-patch lead time for critical issues measured in hours, not weeks
- Security posture continuously measurable through dashboards, not snapshotted at audit time
- Delivery teams experience security as a capability that speeds them up, not a gate that slows them down
- Runtime threats detected and routed to incident response with actionable context, not raw alerts
Tech stack
Talk to us
Compliance deadline approaching? hello@byteherder.com