Kubernetes Platforms
Production-grade clusters
teams actually want to use.
Overview
We design and operate kubernetes platforms that compound rather than sprawl. Multi-tenant by design, GitOps end-to-end, and opinionated enough to keep teams out of the platform and inside their product.
What we build
- Multi-cluster topologies with policy-driven workload placement
- GitOps delivery pipelines (ArgoCD / Flux) with progressive rollout
- Self-service tenant onboarding via infrastructure-as-code
- Observability stacks — metrics, logs, traces — wired in from day one
- Zero-trust networking with service mesh and mTLS
- Cost visibility per tenant, per workload
When you need this
Kubernetes platforms age badly when nobody owns them as a product. If the signals below sound familiar, it’s probably time for a reset rather than another patch.
- Every team is rebuilding the same kubernetes basics — ingress, secrets, logging — from scratch
- Platform engineers spend most of their week on tickets, toil, and ad-hoc permission requests
- Clusters stuck on old versions because upgrade risk feels too high to plan around
- Security posture inconsistent between environments; auditors can’t get a clean answer
- Infrastructure cost is a single line item with no way to attribute it to teams or workloads
- Onboarding a new service or engineer takes weeks instead of hours
- Multi-region, multi-cloud, or regulated-environment expansion on the roadmap
Common challenges we solve
- Kubernetes run as shared-nothing infrastructure rather than a product with internal customers and a published interface
- RBAC that’s either too permissive (audit risk) or so restrictive that teams route around it with shadow access
- Observability fragmented across systems — logs here, metrics there, traces somewhere else — with no joined-up story
- GitOps done halfway: app manifests declarative, but secrets, infra, and policy still imperative and manual
- Cost sprawl from unbounded requests/limits, orphaned workloads, and zombie namespaces
- Compliance evidence (BIO, ISO 27001, SOC 2) gathered manually, quarterly, under duress
- Disaster-recovery plans that have never actually been tested end-to-end
Outcomes we deliver
- Platform team moves from reactive to proactive — from ticket queue to product roadmap
- Mean time from code-to-production measured in hours, not weeks, across every team
- Zero-downtime cluster upgrades become routine instead of scheduled events
- Security and compliance controls provably in place, continuously auditable, automatically evidenced
- Infrastructure cost reduced and attributable to specific workloads and owners
- Developer experience where engineers actually want to use the platform instead of working around it
- Clear handover: runbooks, dashboards, and post-engagement support model that lets your team take it forward
Tech stack
Talk to us
Platform project ahead? hello@byteherder.com